Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
FDA’s Critical Path Initiative: Opportunities for Metabolomics
  • Richard D. Beger
  • Center for Metabolomics
  • Division of Systems Toxicology
  • National Center for Toxicological Research
  • Jefferson, AR 72079
  • Richard.Beger@fda.hhs.gov


  • 2nd Metabolomics Society Meeting
  • Boston, MA
  • June 28, 2005
2
“The views expressed here are
those of the author and
not necessarily of the
U.S. Food and Drug Administration.”
3
Overview
  • FDA’s Critical Path Initiative
  • FDA Critical Path Opportunities
  • Voluntary Genomics Data Submission (VGDS)
  • FDA ArrayTrack software
  • File format for ‘omics’ data submission


4
 
5
Critical Path for Medical Products
  • Explicitly states “applying technologies such as genomics, proteomics, bioinformatics systems, and new imaging technologies to the science of medical product development…provide tools to detect safety problems early, … and lead to new clinical endpoints.
  • Major Opportunity:  Bridging biomarkers to permit monitoring of functional pathways, drug efficacy, damage, and damage-response in both preclinical and clinical models.


6
 
7
 
8
 
9
VGDS Milestones
  • May 2002: First FDA-DIA PGx workshop – Introduction of “Safe Harbor” concept for PGx data submissions
  • November 2003: Release of draft Guidance for Industry: Pharmacogenomic Data Submissions
  • November 2003: Second FDA-DIA PGx workshop – Discussion around biomarkers, voluntary vs. required submissions, first public comments
  • February 2004: Docket for guidance “officially” closed – 35 sets of comments received
  • March 2004: First VGDS received
  • July 2004: First IPRG-sponsor meeting to discuss VGDS
10
VGDS Milestones, cont’d
  • January/February 2005: Interdisciplinary Pharmacogenomics Review Group (IPRG) formally created
  • March 2005: Final Guidance for Industry: Pharmacogenomic Data Submissions published, together with two companion documents detailing the VGDS process and the IPRG
  • March 2005: Genomics at FDA website goes live
  • April 2005: Third FDA-DIA PGx workshop – Looking ahead: translating PGx into clinical trials and clinical practice
  • May 2005: First FDA/IPRG-EMEA/PGWP-sponsor meeting to discuss VGDS
  • March 2006: First panomic submission


11
 
12
 
13
What Does the New PG Guidance Do?
  • Introduces a classification for genomic biomarkers
  • Introduces a new data submission pathway to share information with the FDA on a voluntary basis
  • Encourages the voluntary submission of exploratory genomic data
  • Introduces new agency-wide PG review group Interdisciplinary Pharmacogenomics Review Group (IPRG)
  • Clarifies how the FDA will review genomic data submissions
14
What Does the New PG Guidance Not Do?
  • Does not provide information on how to validate genomic biomarkers
  • Does not provide information on how to use genomic biomarker during drug or device development process (scientific vs. regulatory guidance)
  • Does not expand into other “-omics’ areas such as proteomics or metabolomics
  • Does not create new processes for the review of required data submissions
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
ArrayTrack – Summary
20
VGDS: Clinical submission
21
VGDS: Non-clinical Submission
22
VGDS Best Practice document
23
VGDS Best Practice document: Metabolomics Section
24
VGDS Best Practice document for Metabolomics
25
Acknowledgements
  • Array Track
  • Megan Cao
  • Steve Harris
  • Hongmei Sun
  • Hong Fang
  • Qian Xie
  • Feng Qian
  • Jie Wu
  • Huixiao Hong
  • Roger Perkins